Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Shall We Celebrate Halloween?

Every year, when October 31st is approaching, children and parents are in conflict of whether celebrating Halloween or not. Children face tough choices, to either participate or miss a day for their Halloween party day at school. Parents either ignore or go with the flow of society in their decision for Halloween. Definitely, we, including children, all need to understand our Christian perspective on Halloween, thus, it enables us to make a right choice. Should we celebrate Halloween?

History and Believe System of Halloween

The belief system behind Halloween came from the druids, the priests of ancient Gaul and Britain. The druids believed that witches, demons, and spirits of the dead roamed the earth on the eve of November 1. Halloween originally was a Druid holy day called "The Vigil of Saman." In early Britain it was called the festival of Samhain, which is pronounced sow-en. This festival would last for 3 days and many people would parade in costumes made from the skins and heads of animals.
The spread of Christianity did not make people forget their early customs. When Roman Catholicism became a world political and religious power the pagan customs were still widely celebrated. On the eve of All Hallows, Oct. 31, people continued to celebrate the festivals of Samhain and Pomona Day. In 800 A.D. the Roman Catholic Church moved "All Saints' Day" from May to November 1st. All of the "saints" who did not have a special day to their honor on the Catholic calendar were to be honored on All Saints' Day—a time to pay respect to the dead by visiting their graves. The "new day" that was to replace the pagan vigil of the dead was called "All Hallows Day". It soon became the custom to call the evening before, "All Hallows Eve", which was soon shortened to Halloween. The Halloween we celebrate today includes all of these influences, Pomona Day's apples, nuts, and harvest, the Festival of Samhain's black cats, magic, evil spirits and death, and the ghosts, skeletons and skulls from All Saints Day and All Soul's Day. (http://www.klove.com/promodetails.aspx?i=6055, Oct/30/2011) 

Steve Russo explained how the Halloween was in the minds of ancient people. It was a pure form of evil and fear upon evil was presented. He says,
            "As the power of the sun waned with the onset of winter, people were afraid that life itself, and not just the year, was coming to an end. They imagined that the night was haunted by ghosts and witches, and more particularly by the spirits of the dead who were revisiting their earthly homes. With the supernatural rampant, the night was full of danger and omens. Concerned for their survival, people employed every possible means to fortify the flames of the dying sun and to chase away, or at least pacify, the evil spirits. For this purpose they lit bonfires and sometimes offered gruesome sacrifices." (Russo, Steve. Halloween: What's A Christian to Do? Eugene, Oregon: Harvest House Publishers, 1998. p. 9,10).

Why It is Bad? 

  • Evil one blinds the spiritual eyes of people by this kind of activity, so that they cannot see the Gospel of light in them. 2 Corinthians 4:4 says, "whose minds the god of this age has blinded, who do not believe, lest the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine on them."
  • Evil is exalted by promoting their evil deeds. Definitely, we should not expose children to the evil deeds. Ephesians 5:11-12 says, " And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them. For it is shameful even to speak of those things which are done by them in secret."
  • It is the work of darkness and power of evil that attack and influence people in the spiritual realm. Ephesians 6:12 says, "For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this age, against spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places."

What the Bible Says to The Christians about It?

  1. Christians are to avoid all forms of evil. "Abstain from every form of evil." (1 Thess. 5:22)
  2. Christians are to extract the leaven from the lump. Meaning; Christians should pluck out even a little evil or sinful form from our lives. For it will destroy the whole being.  "A little leaven leavens the whole lump." (Gal.5:9)
  3. Christians are called to live holy and sanctified life. "Come out from among them and be separate, says the Lord. Do not touch what is unclean, and I will receive you." (2 Cor.6:17)
  4. Christians are called to be distinctive Christians apart from this world."And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God." (Rom.12:2)
  5. Christians are not to be engaged in any evil. "There shall not be found among you anyone who makes his son or his daughter pass through the fire, or one who practices witchcraft, or a soothsayer, or one who interprets omens, or a sorcerer, or one who conjures spells, or a medium, or a spiritist, or one who calls up the dead." (Deu.18:10-11)

Why We Do Not Celebrate It?

  1. We know the root of Halloween is, although superficially fun to participate in it. The believe system of it and the truth that we know cause us not to celebrate.
  2. We choose to obey God to live a distinctive Christian life in this world.
  3. We believe that celebrating Halloween mean we cannot bear testimony to others and are not glorifying our Savior.
  4. We compromise our Christian value, if we engage in Halloween.
  5. We want to avoid all forms of evil and not to promote it. 

In reality, it is difficult to live a distinctive Christian life. However, we are called to live for Christ as the lights to the world. "You are the light of the world." (Matt.5:14). As a light, each one of us can shine in the darkness of this world by living distinctive lifestyle. What's the point, if the light is merged with darkness (compromised)? Then it loses its radiance of light. Let your light shine in this world. Indeed, we do not want to celebrate Halloween.

Tackling The Issue of The Day

This situation has took place during the annual gathering of the Christian families at Christian camp site in 2011. The youth and some adults from this author's church were attending the camp.  This article is how the author wanted to debrief the issue. The youth and pastor has been discussed the issue through this writing.

According to eyewitness account, a young woman was screaming, laughing, calling out someone, uttering senseless tone (gibberish), acting weird (bizarre), and rolling on the ground during Christian youth gathering. This scene causes some perplex, some fear, some doubt, some bitterly reject, some discomfort, some acknowledge, some turn it to be spirit filled moment, etc. When it is over, the responses from the youth are summed up into one word, "Confused." What is that all about? Three common questions that they may have in this confusion. These are the questions;

            The first question: is this Holy Spirit manifestation?
            The manifestation of Holy Spirit in the believers lives is seen in the first century Christians in Acts 2. Where the Holy Spirit came upon the believers on the day of Pentecost. The same old story that is used by so called Charismatic moment for in any case of spiritual manifestation. Today, Charismatic movement has different faces and invading Christendom in various format. So, above scenario, is that Holy Spirit manifestation? Definitely not. These are the reasons;
            (1) Holy Spirit manifests for purpose of edifying the body of Christ, the church. That is His very purpose for coming and in order to help/ edify us before God. Jesus says that He will send the Helper (Holy Spirit) for us, the Church. And Holy Spirit will glorify Christ and represent Christ (John.16:14). Holy Spirit has gifted Christians with spiritual gifts for the purpose of edification of the Church. Paul concurs it, says, "Even so you, since you are zealous for spiritual gifts, let it be for the edification of the church that you seek to excel." (1Cor.14:12). Where is the edification in this? Instead of youth turning into God and conforming themselves more like Christ, utilizing their spiritual gifts to serve the Church of Christ, instead, it brings confusion, discouragements, driving them away from the church, feeling that you are not good enough for Christ, etc..
            (2) Holy Spirit does not gibberish, bizarre or rolling on the ground. Instead, Holy Spirit brings words (message) in clarity, "we hear them speaking in our own tongues the wonderful works of God." (Act.2:11). He brings Truth with power as Peter preached God's word (Act. 2:14-39). He brings Gospel (Act.2:32-39). He brings sinners to be saved by grace and added to the church as members (Act.2:41). The one who rolling on the ground in the Bible is evil one (Mk.9:20; Jn.18:6).
            (3) Holy Spirit manifestation is not for showmanship nor personal gain. It is difficult to discern when a little truth mixed with error. When someone is screaming God's name and saying that he or she is with Holy Spirit, defiantly we are easily yield to that person. But stop for a moment and ask yourself a question, is this for me? Is that person is doing it for himself or herself? People have an attitude like, "holier than thou." They love to prove others that they are better in spiritual life (by doing such scene) and bring condemnations or accusations to those who are not like them. They normally say, "You are not good enough in your Christian life. You don't have Holy Spirit (Yet, we are sealed with Holy Spirit in our salvation through Christ. Eph.1:13). Your churches are wrong, they are only doing religious things (Then, what are they doing? Anything that doesn't appeared to be religious?). You must have spiritual power (they prefer you to do the same as they often do odd actions and unusual physical appearances). Paul says, " Therefore comfort each other and edify one another, just as you also are doing." (1Thess.5:11). When they don't comfort you nor edify you, that is not Holy Spirit at all. And Holy Spirit will NEVER, EVER speak evil about the Church of Jesus Christ. Holy Spirit convicts sinners for their sins (Jn. 16:8) but NEVER CONDEMN the believers in Christ. Romans 8:1 says, "There is therefore now no condemnation to those who are in Christ Jesus, who do not walk according to the flesh, but according to the Spirit."

            Second question: is this a sign of mature spiritual life?
            Erroneous one accepts such experiences as a sign for spiritual maturity in their lives as Christians. Definitely, it is not the case. In fact, spiritual maturity is nothing to do with our experiences at all. Beside, no known spiritual Christians have ever boastful for their spiritual experiences; nor they prioritize those as a mean of measurement to their spiritual maturity in the church history. True Christian experiences are properly like steps that we need to climb up in our spiritual journey for growth. Sometime, God brings afflictions in life, persecutions (2Tim.3:12), spiritual encounters with both God and people. Sometime, even joyful experiences like God's deliverance from harmful ways, or healing from sicknesses, etc. that we enjoy. These experiences are nothing worthwhile when compare to the Heavenly glory that we are bound to receive. Thus, Paul says in his sufferings, "For I consider that the sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory which shall be revealed in us." (Rom.8:18). Paul has more spiritual encounters than anyone of us, yet he counted them all as lost for better purpose, to gain Christ. He says "I also count all things loss for the excellence of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord, for whom I have suffered the loss of all things, and count them as rubbish, that I may gain Christ." (Phil.3:8). What more we need if we have Christ? Are you perusing Christ or are you seeking spiritual experiences? Paul says to young Timothy, "But you, O man of God, flee these things and pursue righteousness, godliness, faith, love, patience, gentleness." (1Tim.6:11). Our adversary wants to deviate or derail our attention from Christ, and substituting none essential/ superficial agendas such as spiritual experiences into our lives. Mature Christians would sound more like these;
"that I may know Him and the power of His resurrection, and the fellowship of His sufferings, being conformed to His death," (Phil.3:10)
"For to me, to live is Christ, and to die is gain." (Phil.1:21)
"I press toward the goal for the prize of the upward call of God in Christ Jesus." (Phil.3:14).

            Third question: am I good enough in my spiritual life?
Galatians 6:9 says, "And let us not grow weary while doing good, for in due season we shall reap if we do not lose heart." This verse knows exactly what we are. We worry for everything in our lives either doing good or bad. Why are you weary when you pursuing Christ daily and being obedience to Him. People seek for perfection, yet Christ never expected from us that we can be perfect on our own like perfectionists. Thus, He prayed that we are to be perfect only in Him with the Father. "I in them, and You in Me; that they may be made perfect in one," (Jn. 17:23). Yes, we are weak in our daily task to follow Christ. That doesn't give opportunity for our adversary to get hold of us and make us guilty. That is their tactic. Remember, when I am weak I am strong in Christ. Paul says, "We are fools for Christ's sake, but you are wise in Christ! We are weak, but you are strong!" (1Cor.4:10). Let's give a little credit to ourselves that we are more than conqueror, the victors in Christ Jesus (Rom.8:37). If you and I feel being fainthearted/weak by seeing others' spiritual maturity, let us turn positive way that we should do more, love more, serve more, preach the gospel more as we pursue Christ in our daily lives. We will live in obedience and follow Christ. That would please our Savior. That would be far better than having experiences of so called spiritual manifestation.
"I found it necessary to write to you exhorting you to contend earnestly for the faith which was once for all delivered to the saints." (Jude 3).
Soli Deo gloria!

Monday, July 26, 2010

Testimony of Lee Strobel

Your testimony drives people around you to know Christ in their lives.

Sunday, June 13, 2010

Satan's Final Fatal Blow to Local Churches

The old trick turns into new by new advocates of Satan, by that the church of Jesus Christ has been attacked. Many will be deceived and many will know the claws of Satan's advocates; regard to local church and their attack. Harold Camping is calling out many to flee from the local churches. When heresy arises the characteristics of it are always the same. First, heretics will create confusion and delusion to the minds of people. Second, they will go against the Word of God in various forms. Sometime, they even use the Bible to deceive and warrant their point of views. Third, they try to separate people, or sometime believers from body of believers into their group. Isolation of individuals is their agenda. Finally, they will inject fatal error to the followers and end up in destruction. History of Jim Jones and David Koresh are well demonstrated these points. Harold Camping is one of heretics in our time at San Francisco and Greater Bay area. Through his "Family Radio" program, he is spreading heresy rapidly into all over the world. Many of Burmese community are affected by his heresy here in Bay area and in the country of Burma. One must informed the heresy when it is gloaming in horizon. The truth must be also told in order to discern the truth from error. Here is the article from CRI (Christian Research Institute) by James R. White which gives much detail information on Harold Camping's heresy.

Feature Article: DC989

DANGEROUS AIRWAVES: HAROLD CAMPING’S CALL TO FLEE THE CHURCH
by James R.White

This article first appeared in the Christian Research Journal, volume 25, number 1 (2002). For further information or to
subscribe to the Christian Research Journal go to: http://www.equip.org

SYNOPSIS

Harold Camping is the president of Family Radio. He teaches that God has done away with the church, and thus there should be no more local congregations, elders, deacons, and ordinances such as baptism or the Lord’s Supper. He maintains that the Holy Spirit has left the church as an empty shell with no power to proclaim the gospel. Because Camping calls his followers to flee the churches and form fellowships around his teachings, Christians must understand what the Bible teaches about the church and what the proper means of biblical interpretation are in order to counter Camping’s false teachings. He has the ears of millions across the world through his far-flung radio empire. His listeners tend to develop a strong attachment to him, finding in his esoteric, allegorical interpretations a view of Scripture they do not hear anywhere else (and for good reason). His name is Harold Camping, famous for his failed prophecy concerning the return of Christ in 1994, and now becoming more famous for his teaching against the very church of Jesus Christ.
Harold Camping is the president of Family Station, Inc., a California-based ministry with worldwide broadcast facilities, including more than 150 outlets in the United States.1 His deep, sonorous voice can be heard any hour of the day — by radio, satellite, or Internet broadcast. Camping helped begin Family Stations in 1958, and he later devoted himself full time to the ministry. He is especially known for his daily call-in program, “Open Forum.” His style is unmistakably unique: he speaks slowly with a distinctive voice and cadence. Over the years, Family Radio has provided a valuable service to many churches and pastors. Many very solid, godly men have proclaimed the gospel of grace through the facilities of Family Radio, including the late Dr. James Boice of the Tenth Presbyterian Church. Many local ministries have been greatly blessed by having their services aired in their area on the network. Today, however, churches and ministries are fleeing Family Radio as people would flee a burning building. Why? Harold Camping has chosen to pit himself against the entire church, proclaiming that God has
destroyed the church, that the era of the church is finished, and that the only means God now uses to evangelize the world is Family Radio “and ministries like it.” Camping spends much of his on-air time explaining to listeners why they should leave their churches, abandon the oversight of elders, stop using the ordinances (baptism and the Lord’s Supper), and gather around their radios for “fellowship” in the “postchurch age.” He has declared that churches that once aired their worship services on the network must follow new rules. They can no longer call themselves churches on the program. They cannot announce meeting times, and pastors cannot refer to themselves by that title on the air. As a result, most have removed their services, leaving Family Radio a relative ghost town. People are nevertheless still listening to Camping. Pastors who had no idea that Camping had a hold on members of their churches are reporting losing individual families, up to as many as 10 families from a single congregation. They are “fleeing” the church.
Camping’s teachings are unbiblical and dangerous. He has misrepresented the church and challenged the wisdom of God in ordering it as He has. For all who love Christ’s church and His truth, an answer must be given.

CAMPING’S TEACHINGS DEFINED

According to Harold Camping, the church age of 1,900 years is over. The church as an organized entity has come to an end. The invisible or eternal church still exists in heaven, but the visible church, made up of congregations and denominations, has been done away with. God has destroyed the church. Why has God done this?
Camping says Israel is a “picture” of the church. Throughout Israel’s history, God brought judgment upon it for the presence of the “high places,” which were centers of idolatrous worship often associated with the Canaanite gods. Camping points out that while God blessed Israel despite the presence of the high places, eventually His patience wore out, and He brought judgment against it. In the same way, says Camping, “high places” have been in the Christian church from the very beginning. What are these high places? They are false teachings Camping believes come from human minds rather than from God. Some are commonly debated topics, such as baptismal regeneration and women as pastors in churches. Some are unique to Camping himself, such as his insistence that faith has no role in salvation (seemingly over responding to an emphasis on man’s role in salvation). It is a small list, and it is relevant only to conservative, and especially Reformed, churches. Camping does not really include liberal Protestant denominations in his thinking. His teachings are specifically directed against conservative, evangelical, Reformed churches. At some point in time, God brought judgment upon the church and destroyed it.2 Since that day, the church has been an “empty shell.” What does it mean that God has destroyed the church? Camping lists a number of results.
First, the gospel is no longer applied within the church, and the Holy Spirit is no longer active in the church. You can preach the gospel in the church all you want, but the Holy Spirit is not there; hence, there is no salvation taking place in the church. Anyone who is saved is saved “outside” the church (a phrase Camping repeats over and over again). When pressed, Camping has admitted that those who have been “converted” since the end of the church age within formal churches only look like they are saved — they are actually still unsaved. God is working entirely separate from the church today. Second, there are no more elders or deacons. The church no longer has divine authority. Those who act as if they have this authority do so without divine warrant. There is no more church discipline nor any reason to fear such discipline should one of Camping’s followers encounter it for promoting his teachings. Third, the ordinances have been done away with. Camping believes baptism and the Lord’s Supper were “ceremonial laws” that were given to the church alone. Since the church is gone, so are the ordinances. There is to be no more baptism and celebration of the Lord’s Supper. Camping says, amazingly, the “postchurch believer” can read about the ordinances and receive a spiritual benefit by doing so.
So what is the “postchurch believer” to do? Camping teaches that such precepts as a “Sunday Sabbath” and the command not to forsake the gathering of believers (Heb. 10:25) are still binding. Believers therefore are first to flee the local churches because they no longer have divine authority and then seek fellowship with other “like-minded” believers. If there are only a few such people, they can gather on Sundays, sing hymns, and listen to Family Radio together. If there is a group, they can form a fellowship. These fellowships, however, are to have no elders, deacons, or ordinances. They are unorganized groups that simply meet for edification. If an entire church embraces Camping’s views, they are to reorganize as a fellowship by removing their elders and deacons and removing the name “church” from their door.

CAMPING ON THE CHURCH

Harold Camping is first and foremost a radio personality. While he has written some books in the past (including the infamous 1994? which asserted his false prediction of the return of Christ in 1994), his teachings are promulgated primarily through radio, tapes, and audio files on the Internet. He has produced, at the time of this writing, a single pamphlet titled “Has the Era of the Church Age Come to an End?”3 Most of his teaching, therefore, must be presented by citation of his radio programs. He presented a 13-part series on his new doctrine during the summer of 2001.4 He has also inserted commentary on this particular teaching into every other aspect of his radio ministry, so that we are able to draw primarily from comments he made in his study of the Book of Hebrews.5 Here he provided a concise summary of the fundamental tenets of his new teaching: At the beginning of the final tribulation, God has a quick change in His action. The beginning of the tribulation signified that the churches have ceased to be the means by
which God plans to evangelize the world, and this is why it is great tribulation.
Remember in our last study we talked about, it’s a time of weeping. It’s a time when we
ought to be sorrowing in our hearts because we see the churches that should have known
better, they have not turned away from their wrong doctrines, and so finally God has removed the candlestick so they have a form of godliness, but they really deny the power of it. Camping focuses his attention on the churches from which he has drawn his most devoted followers. He
says they should have “known better” than to believe the doctrines that make up the “high places.” Camping draws heavily from Revelation 11:7, asserting that the two witnesses are a picture of the church. Since these “candlesticks” were killed when their testimony was finished, so, too, the church will be destroyed when God ceases to use it as the means of evangelization.6 He “removes the candlestick” of the church, leaving it a “hollow shell.” God brings the church to an end, signaling the beginning of what the Bible describes as the great tribulation. It is a great tribulation because God has set aside the church as the means by which He evangelizes the world. Although the Bible is still present in the church, where people still preach from the Bible to some degree, the power of salvation is absent. God has another plan. For a few years, therefore, it is doom and gloom.
Camping explains what he means when he says the church has become a “hollow shell.” Since most in the church do not even know what God has done, they continue to try to do what is right, teaching and preaching the gospel as they had done when the church still existed and was being used by God. Something, however, has changed. Even though most do not sense it, the Holy Spirit is no longer in the church, guiding, directing, blessing the preaching, giving divine authority to the proclamation of the Word, and especially applying the gospel in order for souls to be saved. The result is that the church continues on — impotent and running solely on inertia. This is the state of the church today, according to Camping. In his written presentation, Camping says: It is no wonder that it is almost impossible to find a church today that will modify its Confessions to make them more faithful to the Bible. Remember the Bible says that it is God who works in us to will and to do of His good pleasure. Therefore, if a church no longer has a candlestick it means God is no longer working in that church. The elders and deacons are being guided by their own minds rather than by the Holy Spirit.7 Today’s pastors and elders are bereft of the Spirit’s guidance, according to Camping, and can see only with human eyes, not divinely enlightened eyes. Those outside the church in Family Radio, on the other hand, have the Spirit, continue to proclaim the true gospel, and are seeing multitudes saved as a result.
When speaking of his understanding of John 21, which he says no one has ever understood until now, Camping utters words that, to the apologetically attuned ear, sound frighteningly similar to the words of Joseph Smith, Charles Taze Russell, or Victor Paul Weirwille. Now that people are to flee their churches, to whom are they to look for guidance concerning the organization of these “fellowships” in which they are to gather?Who else but Harold Camping?
No matter what Camping’s motives might be, this is how aberrant groups begin. His attitude is surely not that of humility when he writes: Obedience to the command of Luke 21:20–24 can be accomplished in various ways. If a person or family is a member of a church they can withdraw their membership and fellowship on Sundays with whomever there may be who are of like mind. Such withdrawal may initiate a move by the church to excommunicate. For that individual
that is not a trauma because he has become convinced that the church era has come to an
end and the church no longer has any divine authority.8 Knowing the tremendous spiritual damage resulting from Camping’s teachings in churches all across America and beyond, such flippant references to church discipline and the denial of the divine authority of the church the Lord Jesus established are deeply troubling.

ALLEGORICAL INTERPRETATION REFUTED

How has Camping arrived at the conclusion that the church has been destroyed? There is one simple answer: unfettered, inconsistent, arbitrary, and, at times, incoherent allegorical interpretation of the text of Scripture. Camping has long taught the view, popularized by Origen in the early church, that first sees a basic, literal meaning anyone can understand. More important is the moral meaning, which requires more insight. Most important is the “real” meaning, or the “spiritual” meaning, which requires spiritual insight and knowledge. According to Camping, every passage of the Bible has some relevance to the gospel message. This becomes the basis, then, for his allegorical interpretations where anything in the Bible becomes “fair
game” to be made into a picture of whatever Harold Camping desires. For example, to substantiate his current teachings against the church, Camping has used the two witnesses of Revelation 11, Jerusalem, Judea, all of Old Testament Israel, Hezekiah’s life, and the boat the disciples used in John 21 as “pictures” of the church. Within less than the span of five verses Peter can “represent” the church as a whole, a disciple, and Christ. There is no limitation to what can be “seen” with such “interpretation.” Allegorical interpretation contrasts with the grammatical-historical method, which first determines a passage’s meaning by reference to its language, context, and background. When we read the biblical text, we wish to know what the original author intended to convey to his original audience in his own context. Until we determine this,we truly have no basis for asking other questions, such as, “What does thismean tome today?” Allegorical interpretation ignores the grammar and original context of the Scriptures, which is why it must be rejected as a valid method of interpretation. It is simply unverifiable. In other words, no person using the allegorical method can honestly and logically affirm that his or her conclusions are actually based upon the text that is being interpreted. Because the actual meaning of the text is ignored, the allegorical meaning can have no more weight than one invests in the allegorical interpreter. Since each allegorical interpreter may “see” or “feel” something different in the text, allegorical interpretations can never be verified by others working with the same text (unlike real biblical exegesis, where the work of generations of scholars verifies and reverifies the conclusions already reached). The result of this fatal flaw in the system is that no allegorical interpretation can claim the authority of the original text. This is because the source of the interpretation is not the text itself but the mind of the interpreter who “sees” things in it. Allegorical interpretation cannot compel anyone else to belief since it is personally derived, and the people who accept it do so only because they accept the word of the interpreter, not because they invest any authority in the text itself. Allegorical interpretations have no more authority than the one announcing them.
Allegorical interpretation destroys the authority of the text of Scripture. No one using this method can honestly say, “The Word of God says,” for their system replaces the meaning of the text (which is communicated through grammar, lexical meanings, context, and background) with the more-or-less relevant insights and imagination of the interpreter. Christians believe the Scriptures are “God breathed” (2 Tim. 3:16–17), and therefore are authoritative by nature. When the allegorical interpreter ignores the text, the source of Scripture’s authority is replaced by the thoughts of mere men and women. This leads to every kind of abuse of God’s Word. False teachers often utilize such unverifiable forms of “interpretation” as a cover in order to replace biblical truth with their own false doctrines. Untaught and unstable believers (2 Pet. 3:16) are often susceptible to the “smooth speech” of such teachers, and without solid knowledge of how to properly interpret the Bible, they accept false conclusions, which are presented with great confidence and power. So when we point out Camping’s erroneous use of allegorical interpretation, we are not merely arguing about obtuse, insignificant points of theology. We are defending the very authority of the Scripture, for a Bible that cannot communicate God’s truth consistently to each generation cannot be a solid foundation for the faith.9

THE CHURCH DEFENDED

Camping’s attack comes when many in evangelicalism are more than willing to listen to criticism of the church. This is due to the very poor “ecclesiology” rampant today. Rather than seeing the church as the divine institution that the Bible teaches it to be, many today see it more as a commodity, something to be “shopped” and “tried” until you find a “nice fit.” Paul’s description rings empty in many ears today: “But in case I am delayed, I write so that you may know how one ought to conduct himself in the household of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and support of the truth” (1 Tim. 3:15).10 The context of the passage is that of the local church. Paul taught that the local body of believers is the household of the living God. This divine institution is the “pillar and support of the truth.” A pillar and support hold something else up, and in this case, the church provides the foundation of the proclamation
of the truth about God and His purposes in this world. It is God’s will that the church, not any manmade substitute, function in this way. The Scriptures often speak of the church’s solidarity, divine purpose, and perpetuity.
Paul explained to the Ephesians: “So then you are no longer strangers and aliens, but you are fellow citizens with the saints, and are of God’s household, having been built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Christ Jesus Himself being the corner stone, in whom the whole building, being fitted together is growing into a holy temple in the Lord, in whom you also are being built together into a dwelling of God in the Spirit” (Eph. 2:19–22). The church is built upon an unchanging and unshakable foundation. Jesus Christ, the risen Lord, is the cornerstone, and He has provided a solid foundation in the apostles and prophets through whom God’s Word has been given to His people. This whole building is being divinely built “into a dwelling of God in the Spirit,” a description plainly proclaiming the divine nature of the church as God has established it. To denigrate the true church, which listens obediently to her Lord in His Word, is to attack the very home of the Holy Spirit Himself. Indeed, as Paul said a little later in the same epistle, “Now to Him who is able to do exceeding abundantly beyond all that we ask or think, according to the power that works within us, to Himbe the glory in the church and in Christ Jesus to all generations forever and ever. Amen” (Eph. 3:20–21). God is to receive glory in the church and in Christ Jesus “to all generations forever and ever.” Not only does this speak to the purpose of the church (the glorification of her Lord) but also to the perpetuity of the church.11 Unlike Harold Camping (or Joseph Smith before him), the Bible teaches the ongoing nature of the divine institution that is the church. Nowhere do we ever read that God has placed a time limitation
on the church, nor would He end its role in bringing Him glory. Christians are called to be a vital part of the local church. They are not mere “extras” outside the discipleship activity reserved only for “super Christians”; indeed, they are part and parcel of a life of obedience. Note the record of Luke in Acts 2:41–42, 47: “So then, those who had received his word were baptized; and there were added that day about three thousand souls. And they were continually devoting
themselves to the apostles’ teaching and to fellowship, to the breaking of bread and to prayer….[They were] praising God and having favor with all the people. And the Lord was adding to their number day by day those who were being saved.”
God joins people to the church. It is as much a divine action as is His miraculous work of salvation. He does not bring Christians to spiritual life so they can experience it in solitude; rather, He brings Christians together in community, which is the church. Part of God’s concern for the church is expressed in the fact that He organizes it and places elders12 within it by the gifting of the Spirit. These elders are commanded to keep watch over the flock. Note
Luke’s recounting of the work of the apostles: “When they had appointed elders for them in every church, having prayed with fasting, they commended them to the Lord in whom they had believed” (Acts 14:23). These elders were appointed in every church. No church was exempt from this apostolic activity, for every local body was in need of this divinely given leadership. God, moreover, speaks to those who have been put in this position of service and leadership concerning their duties and role: “Be on guard for yourselves and for all the flock, among which the Holy Spirit has made you overseers, to shepherd the church of God which He purchased with His own blood” (Acts 20:28). The elders are divinely commanded and gifted to guard the flock. Theirs is a sacred trust, for the object of their service is precious to God. Those who are in the church are likewise commanded to obey those in positions of authority over them (a command Camping, based upon his allegorical errors, openly encourages others to transgress): “Obey your leaders and submit to them, for they keep watch over your souls, as those who will give an account. Let them do this with joy and not with grief, for this would be unprofitable for you” (Heb. 13:17). The person who cannot answer the question: “Who are those to whom you are to submit as noted in Hebrews 13:17?” is not only in grave spiritual danger from every kind of cult and –ism but is also in clear rebellion against the revealed will of God, who places elders in the church to provide guidance and places believers in the fellowship for their own benefit and growth. The properly organized and constituted church provides spiritual protection, resulting in mature, stable believers. This is all a part of the demonstration of God’s “manifold wisdom” in the church (see Eph. 3:10).

FLEE FROM HAROLD CAMPING

The airwaves are a dangerous place for the Christian who is vulnerable to spiritual error. Heresy and false teaching abound all across the television and radio dials. Hidden within the plethora of obviously false teachings, however, is an equally dangerous, if less flamboyant, stream of teaching that is just as spiritually dangerous. Harold Camping attracts listeners by eschewing the surface-level, entertainment-based glitz of so many radio and television preachers and teachers. He rightly identifies many problems in the modern church and uses his willingness to speak out on these issues to gain spiritual capital and trust with his listeners. He knows the Bible, quotes the Bible, and professes allegiance to it. His consistency is attractive in a day when many are blown about by every wind of doctrine and flash-in-the-pan evangelists who come and go with frightening regularity. Calm consistency, however, can mask deadly error, and this is the case with Harold Camping. He refused to repent of his 1994 prediction, which was based on the erroneous allegorical interpretation and numerological speculation that marks his teaching. Although many decried his prediction, once it was past, it was “old news,” and few cared whether he continued on, undaunted, teaching his false methods of interpretation.
It is not at all surprising, therefore, that eight years after his first debacle Camping is again leading multitudes astray, this time by teaching men and women to remove themselves from God’s ordained means of spiritual growth and protection and to join in unorganized, aimless, and purposeless “fellowships” that lack divine guidance and approbation. His new error is considerably more serious and reprehensible than the first; sadly, it is not garnering nearly the kind of critical response from Christian leaders that his first error did, for many today lack a biblically based love for, and commitment to, the church Christ has established. We should learn from Camping’s errors. Camping has always functioned “outside” the church. His teachings force us to clarify our own commitment to the church and our ministry in it. Camping’s attacks may well be used by God to move His people to reaffirm their love for His church. We must also learn from Camping’s error to see that our methods of interpretation are not dry subjects best left to theologians to hash out. Each of us is responsible to learn where we received the Bible and how we are to properly understand its message. Only then can we help those who have been misled by Harold Camping and all who, like him, replace the divine message of Scripture with their own thoughts and fancies.

NOTES

1. This number includes “repeaters” as well as free-standing stations, both AM and FM.

2. Some are speculating that Camping is moving toward identifying the end of the church age with 1994 in order to “rescue” his past failed prophecy concerning that date. (Harold Camping, 1994? [New York: Vantage Press, 1992].)

3. It is understood that Camping is preparing to write a full-length book on this topic.

4. http://www.familyradio.com/original/realaudio/class.htm.

5. Family Radio’s Family Bible Study, Based upon Heb. 11:34, A Study on Hezekiah, Part 59, Lesson no. 883, aired in August 2001.

6. The fact that the two witnesses are then brought back to life on earth is missing in Camping’s allegorical explanation at this point.

7. “Has the Era of the Church Age Come to an End?” (Oakland: Family Stations, 2002), 21.

8. Ibid., 22.

9. I deal with the defenses offered by practitioners of allegorical interpretation, particularly those based on Paul’s use of allegory in Galatians 4, in Dangerous Airwaves (Amityville, NY: Calvary Press, 2002).

10. Bible quotations are taken from the New American Standard Bible.

11. Many other evidences exist in reference to the church’s longevity. One that is striking is the fact that the church is to celebrate the Lord’s Supper as a proclamation of the Lord’s death “until He comes” (1 Cor. 11:26).

12. Elders and bishops or overseers are all one office, for the terms are used interchangeably in the New Testament.

Friday, May 14, 2010

Book Review on "Ministry Nuts and Bolts: What They Don't Teach Pastors in Seminary" by Aubrey Malphurs



Recently, I read the book on ministry related subject. It's titled, "Ministry Nuts and Bolts." The title caught my attention and it was interesting subject to read. The book is well written and much needed concept to every ministry leader today. Hope you can enjoy my review on this book.

"Ministry Nuts and Bolts: What They Don't Teach Pastors in Seminary"

by Aubrey Malphurs

Aubrey Malphurs (Th.M., Ph.D., Dallas Theological Seminary) is the president of Vision Ministries International and chairman of the Field Education Department at Dallas Seminary. He also serves as a pastor and church planter in his local congregation. He wrote this book "Ministry Nuts and Bolts: What They Don't Teach Pastors in Seminary," published by Kregel Publications, Grand Rapids, MI., 2009, the second edition.

Dr. Malphurs desires that this book may use as a tool to equip a new generation leaders in order to achieve a significant ministry in the twenty-first century churches. He subtitled this book effectively, matching with his purpose, to equip pastors for the ministry. He wrote this book in the perspective of pastor to pastor, sharing his knowledge and guiding them as co-worker in Christ. He uses his experiences as a pastor to present practical solutions to pastoral ministry. This book solemnly focuses on local church ministry and its effectiveness. He said, "I have written this book to help leaders, pastors, and church boards think through these ministry ABCs." (p.13). Thus, author's intended audience is clearly perceived. The book is targeted toward the ministry leaders and pastors. If one must utilize the contents of the book, definitely the outcome of the ministry will be effectual. The author's background as the president of Vision Ministries International and a chairman of the Field Education Department at Dallas Seminary is very appropriate and well qualified to write this kind of book. The author has a fullness of development in the writing and fluidity in his style. This book is well organized in its contents. The author delivers his intend of the book to the readers fully. This book affects me greatly in my personal growth for the ministry. I have learned that a ministry setting likes church need to have those four essential parts in order to grow effectively. I have seen vividly step by step implementation of the author's approach toward the effective local church ministry. Now I agree with author that this book is contained with really the nuts and bolts of the ministry structure. Definitely, this book is a must-have in the hands of ministry leaders. They can read it and practice its principles immediately in their existing ministries. Without this book, the leaders may not realize their ministries that they are missing very important nuts and bolts to hold up the ministry structure.

In this book, the author concerns for the ministry leaders from presumptuous ways of doing ministry. He encourages the leaders to step outside of the box and think for the essential steps in leading of the effective ministry. He suggests four foundational ministry concepts, such as values, mission, vision, and strategy. These are the vital concentrations that drive the local church ministry. In the perception of Value, he says, "Thus, core values define what you believe is God's heart for your ministry or church"(p.17). The author clearly distinguishes what is core value and what is not, along with examples and illustrations. This is a strong point for this book. It just not answers questions, but it gives answers with practical applications.

Important facts are; first, 'Core Value' which has two folds idea, such as 'Constant' and 'Passionate'. Constant value will sustain the ministry's focus and Passionate value will boost the energy in ministry. Core value should be Biblical based value. The author intensely gives instructions on how to discover the core value in a local church ministry.

Second, 'Mission' of a ministry is the direction of ministry itself. The mission statement will guide and serves as the road map of the ministry. The author says, "We cannot predict the future; however, the formulation of a succinct mission statement will help to create a ministry's preferred future." (p.59). So he instills that a mission statement should be broad enough to fit in all church's activities and practices. Also he says further that the mission statement should be brief enough to understand and memorable for the purpose of effective communication.

Third, 'Vision' of the church is the vision of the pastor. God's vision comes through His servant for His people to follow. Therefore, the author's emphasis on leadership in the search of vision is much effective in this book. He denotes that a vision of the church is the future of its ministry. Yet, vision must not be confused with the mission of the church. Author dedicated the entire chapter 'Seven' to clarify the meaning of vision and mission. He distinguishes the differences between Vision and Mission with simplicity and clarity. He makes it easy by giving one single word for both vision and mission. That is 'Vision' as 'Picture' and 'Mission' as 'Statement'.

Forth, 'Strategy' for the ministry is the implementation of all those core value, mission and vision of the local church. Author says, "A strategy provides a sense of momentum or progress." (p.155). He gives five elements of effective strategy for the local church. They are the community, discipleship, dream team, ministry setting and finances. Indeed, all these five areas are much needed to emphasize for gaining momentum of ministry. Every leaders should read this book and learn to organize in minds and practices for the better leadership in ministry.

This book will help leaders of a local church ministry to discover their callings and enable them to define their ministries. In addition to author's detail explanation of the theory, this book supports it with figures and charts for better and clear understanding. It is also equipped with questions and discussion sections in each chapter. Those elements will help the readers to grasp the concept quickly. The author has done tremendous job in his presentation.


Wednesday, September 3, 2008

Exorcism; Can a Christian be Exorcist?

Playing with Devil is no joke at all. Spiritual warfare can be fought in our own world like we know how. Indeed, if you have a power to cast out the demon, you would love to do this proverbially whole day. However, the Christians are misunderstood the word of God and take up the name of Jesus and casting out the demons. Sometime, they even consider themselves as truly spiritual by being able to practice exoticism. What a piety spiritual pride. Here is a part of article written by David Powlison.

The classic texts on spiritual warfare - Ephesians 6:10-20; James 3:14-4:12; 1 Peter 5:6-11 - teach a mode of fighting the devils bid for lordship that centers on the Word of the living God, faith, repentance, prayer, and obedience in the power of the Spirit. There is no hint of exorcistic methods in these passages, because the Bible does not view the problem of sin, especially in Christians, as linked to an indwelling demon who must be evicted.

Although the practice of exorcism has enjoyed popularity at various times and places in church history, the use of exorcism as a means of accomplishing sanctification or creating conditions for successful evangelism is a recent innovation. Where did this demon deliverance approach to ministry and the Christian life come from? Who teaches it? This view of spiritual warfare has been developing only since the late 1960s. There are at least four varieties of demon deliverance ministry within the species. They share fundamental common features, though they diverge in various particulars of both teaching and method. All believe that spiritual warfare grapples with the danger of demonic residents taking over like computer viruses on the hard disk of the soul and thus holding people in bondage to patterns of sin. The labels used here are only intended as rough markers. Authors frequently cite one another across the spectrum, usually favorably. While there is intramural skirmishing on secondary matters, they are close enough in their distinctive emphases to be considered variations of one movement.

First; Early charismatics were the first popular exponents of this new view of spiritual warfare (many subsequent charismatics have repudiated it). Pastor Don Bashams best-selling Deliver Us from Evil (1972) created tremendous interest and notoriety.

Dispensationalists developed the second variety of demon deliverance ministry. A pointedly noncharismatic approach arose in the circles around Dallas Theological Seminary and Moody Bible College and Institute. Authors of well-known books include Mark Bubeck (The Adversary, 1975), Merrill Unger (What Demons Can Do to Saints, 1977), and C. Fred Dickason (Demon Possession and the Christian, 1987).

A third variety arose in what has been called the third wave of the Holy Spirit, centering around Fuller Theological Seminary and the Vineyard movement. Well-known leaders have included the late John Wimber, C. Peter Wagner, Charles Kraft, John White, and Wayne Grudem, and distinctive emphases include signs and wonders, church growth, and third world missions.

A fourth variety might be characterized as broadly evangelical. Neil Anderson (Freedom in Christ Ministries, The Bondage Breaker, 1990), Timothy Warner (Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, Spiritual Warfare, 1991), Tom White (Frontline Ministries, The Believers Guide to Spiritual Warfare, 1990), Ed Murphy (OC International, the massive Handbook for Spiritual Warfare, 1992), and Ray Beeson (Strategic Spiritual Warfare, 1995) have all written fairly recent books weaving features of demon deliverance thinking into a more traditional evangelical perspective.


Holy Laughter? Drunk with Holy Spirit?

Some of youth has come to contact with "Holy Laughter" group by Innocent way. They have been influenced by these kind of experiences, so much so that it spread like fire among us. Here we stand, we can't tolerate this error but must test it out with God's Word.
'Holy laughter' is actually modern invention of sensational people like Rodney Howard-Browne and John Arnott who bring error by their miss-interpretation of the Bible. There is no such thing as lose control and chaotic behavior encouraged by the Scriptures. Instead, the Bible teaches us to be self-controlled and sober minded. Please do not be deceived by this kind of superficial, so called spiritual enlightenment. But rather we should be having simple faith that pleases God in our obedience and testimonial living. Here an article on this topic, written by Hank Hanegraaff the president of Christian Research Institute.


Counterfiet Revival-Article
STATEMENT DL045

Holy Laughter

What Bible verses are most commonly used to support “holy laughter,” and what is your response to them?

Acts 2:13. One passage frequently abused in the current Laughing Revival occurs in Luke’s account of the day of Pentecost: “Some, however, made fun of them and said, They have had too much wine.”
Leaders of this “Counterfeit Revival,” like Rodney Howard-Browne and John Arnott, seem bent on convincing their audiences that the apostles were manifesting all of the characteristics of drunkards. “Why did they think the believers were drunk?” asks Rodney Howard-Browne. “Because they must have acted like drunk people” (The Reality of the Person of the Holy Spirit, 24—25). Laughing Revival advocates argue that, if it happened during the First Pentecost, then it should happen today in an even broader and more spectacular fashion in what many are calling the “Second Pentecost.”
If you look at the passage, the first thing you see is that only some said they were drunk. Second, those who identified them as drunk were scoffers. Others, far from being convinced of their drunkenness, were instead amazed that “each of us hears them speak in his own native language” (NIV). Luke says that they were amazed because these unlearned Galileans were “declaring the wonders of God in a language they could understand. Thus, they were clearly not emitting incoherent noises in a drunken stupor or slurring their words, but they were cogently articulating “the wonders of God.” Peter, in fact, spoke so powerfully that 3,000 people stampeded their way to Calvary.
If the apostles truly were acting like drunks, Peter would have likely given an alternative explanation for their actions — attributing their bizarre behavior to an overwhelming “spiritual intoxication.” Instead, he corrected the scoffers by saying, “These men are not drunk, as you suppose” (v. 15).
In truth, the Bible gives no evidence that the believers “acted like drunk people.” The only behavior disclosed and discussed in Luke’s narrative is speaking in tongues (vv. 4—11). There is therefore no basis whatsoever in the text for imagining or attributing any other action or conduct (such as laughing, falling down, etc.) to those Spirit-filled believers.

Ephesians 5:18. Another verse commonly misrepresented by Laughing Revival advocates encapsulates Paul’s admonition that we should “not get drunk on wine, which leads to debauchery. Instead,” Paul urges, “be filled with the Spirit.” Being “drunk in the Spirit,” according to holy laughter factions, is the God-ordained counterpart to being drunk on alcohol — hence, the rationale for the inebriated-like state and behavior of those caught up in holy laughter.
A careful examination, however, reveals that in no way can this passage be legitimately used to support “spiritual drunkenness.” To begin with, there is no reason to equate being filled with the Spirit with any form of “spiritual drunkenness.” In fact, the context of the passage indicates a consistent use of contrasts to differentiate ungodly behavior from godly conduct. For example, sexual immorality is contrasted with holiness (v. 3). Coarse jesting is contrasted with thanksgiving (v. 4). Foolishness is contrasted with wisdom (vv. 15—16). Likewise, drunkenness is contrasted with being filled with the Spirit (v. 18).
To understand what “being filled with the Spirit” means, one need only read the next few verses which spell out the details in unmistakable terms: “Speak to one another with psalms, hymns and spiritual songs. Sing and make music in your heart to the Lord, always giving thanks to God the Father for everything, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ.” (vv. 19—20). Nowhere is there even a hint of the kind of erratic behavior promoted in Laughing Revival circles.
It is patently absurd to say that “spiritual debauchery” is the God-ordained counterpart to “plain old debauchery.” Or that precedents for indulging in “holy immorality,” “holy impurity,” and “holy greed” can be found in the Bible. Yet if “holy laughter” advocates are to stay consistent with their interpretation of verse 18, no other conclusion can logically follow — for the type of reasoning they use in claiming a biblical basis for so-called “spiritual drunkenness” can also be used to justify other “sanctified” acts of debauchery, immorality, impurity, and greed.
A representative picture of the Bible’s stance against the Laughing Revival phenomenon can readily be gleaned from various portions of Paul’s writings. The apostle listed, for example, “self-control” as one of the fruits of the Spirit (Gal. 5:23) — clearly the opposite of the uncontrolled and chaotic activities that are characteristic of “holy laughter” gatherings. “Let us be alert and sober,” Paul told the Thessalonians (1 Thes. 5:6 NASB) as he contrasted drunkenness with sobriety (vv. 7—8). And to young Timothy, he advised to “be sober in all things” (2 Tim. 4:5). With so much emphasis on “self-control” and sobriety, the burden falls upon holy laughter proponents to reconcile their views with Scripture — a formidable, indeed impossible, undertaking.
Despite this impossibility, some still appeal to personal experience to validate their behavior. This, too, is a dangerous premise from which to operate. As fallen creatures our personal judgments are all too fallible — particularly when it concerns spiritual matters. We should not test experience in light of experience; rather, we should test experience in light of the final court of arbitration, the Word of God. This is precisely why God directs His people to search His written Word for counsel in matters of doctrine and daily living. Faithful followers of Christ must therefore look not to their own personal experiences, but to the Scriptures as the ultimate measuring rod. As Scripture itself exhorts us, “test all things” (1 Thes. 5:21; cf. Acts 17:11; 1 Tim. 3:16).
Even a cursory examination of the Scripture-twisting tactics of men like Rodney Howard-Browne and John Arnott reveals their propensity for taking Scripture out of context to develop a pretext for their convoluted notions. This is why today, more than ever, it is incumbent upon believers to be so familiar with the truth that when a counterfeit looms on the horizon, they will know it instantaneously.
— Hank Hanegraaff